What is NATO? What does NATO do? Who is in NATO? Why is NATO important? You may have asked some of these questions yourself over the years, perhaps after seeing something on the news about the Balkans, or perhaps Afghanistan. Maybe you heard about NATO with regards to the intervention in Libya, or the alliance’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014. Or maybe you’ve just heard the term before and always wanted to know more. It is my hope that this post will be helpful to those who know little about NATO as well as beneficial to those who already have a fair idea of what it is and what it means.
|Flag of NATO|
To start, NATO is an acronym. NATO stands for North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or Organisation du Traité de l’Atlantique Nord (OTAN) in French. As the name suggests, NATO is an organization founded around the North Atlantic Treaty, which was signed on 4 April 1949. Combined, NATO accounts for over 70 percent of the world’s defense spending, and three members (France, the UK, and the US) hold nuclear weapons. Today NATO is comprised of 28 member states, with more (Montenegro) likely to be added soon. NATO’s significance comes from two important clauses of the North Atlantic Treaty, Articles 4 and 5. Article 4 provides the infrastructure for member-states to call for alliance-wide meetings on an emergency basis to discuss ongoing or developing defense or security threats. Article 4 has been triggered five times since 1949:
- Turkey: Iraq War (2003)
- Turkey: Shoot-down of Turkish jet in Syrian civil war (2012)
- Turkey: Syrian Arab Army (SAA) attacks on Turkey (2012)
- Latvia/Lithuania/Poland: Russian invasion of Crimea (2014)
- Turkey: Daesh (2015)
The vastly more important clause of the North Atlantic Treaty, Article 5, has dramatic and distinct ramifications for all citizens of every one of the 28 member-states. Article 5 states the following:
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Basically what it means is that, should any member of NATO come under attack (in Europe or North America), that member may request the alliance assist in their defense. In the entire history of NATO, Article 5 has only been invoked one time, that being by the United States following the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001. NATO’s response to the activation after 9/11 was the deployment of soldiers by almost every NATO member-state to Afghanistan to assist American and Afghan security forces.
|In case you forgot.|
Currently NATO is comprised of most of Europe, along with the United States and Canada. The members are as follows:
The OG Crew — (4 April 1949)
- The Netherlands
- The United Kingdom
- The United States
First Enlargement — (19 February 1952)
Third Enlargement — (30 May 1982)
Fourth Enlargement — (12 March 1999)
Fifth Enlargement — (29 March 2004)
Sixth Enlargement — (1 April 2009)
As you can see, NATO has continued to enlarge in recent years. This has alarmed other countries, in particular, Russia. Russia sees NATO as a relic of the past, something used by the United States to wield immense political power against its rivals (namely Russia itself, along with Serbia and later Libya [as we will explore later]).
|Russian president Vladimir Putin|
Thus, it can be seen that with the fall of the Soviet Union, NATO lost a sense of its original purpose. NATO became a tool to be wielded by US foreign policymakers. Even with the activation of NATO in 2001, the use of the alliance was dubious at best. The original purpose of the alliance had been to fight a war in Europe, not Afghanistan. Some began questioning the usefulness of NATO, while still others outright called for its dissolution. Fortunately for fans of military blocs, Russia gave NATO a breath of new life in 2014 by annexing Crimea from Ukraine.
|Russian soldiers (“Little Green Men”) in Crimea, 2014.|
The annexation of Crimea showed a belligerent side of Russia that had been hinted at in 2008 during the invasion of Georgia, but not fully understood by many in the West. However, the message came through loud-and-clear after Russian troops landed in Crimea, and later the Donbass. Almost immediately, Lithuania, Latvia, and Poland activated Article 4 of the Charter and convened an emergency meeting about Russian aggression. NATO has since deployed permanent forces to the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) and Poland.
|NATO’s plan to bolster the Baltic states and Poland|
While NATO continues to evolve into a 21st century military alliance, one equipped and ready to defend Europe against Russian (or “enemy”) aggression, it also has retained its newfound appreciation for interventions. In March of 2011, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1973, which called for an immediate ceasefire in the then-ongoing Libyan uprising against Muammar Gaddafi. Resolution 1973 gave room for nations or organizations to stand in to implement the no-fly zone/shipping restriction zone, and NATO happily stepped up to the plate. The intervention was known by several names: Operation Odyssey Dawn (United States + Others), Operation Harmattan (France), Operation Ellamy (United Kingdom), and Operation Mobile (Canada). The operation eventually expanded from no-fly zone enforcement to the destruction of Libyan air defense systems. By the time the campaign concluded in October (after Gaddafi was captured and killed brutally by local forces on the ground), over 600 tanks and other armored vehicles, along with 400 rocket launchers, were among the nearly 6,000 military targets destroyed by the coalition.
|Inventory of NATO + Allied assets used in the Libya intervention|
Relations within NATO are strained at the moment, in particular between Western European/American leaders and Turkish leaders. Turkey, a key member of the alliance, has accused the United States of harboring Fethullah Gülen, a man Turkey’s government says is responsible for the July 15, 2016 coup attempt. The United States has yet to extradite Gülen. The future of Turkey’s NATO membership may be in the balance, although many suspect this is only a temporary upset in US/Turkish relations.